TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2606.08415

CoVEBench: Can Video Editing Models Handle Complex Instructions?

Jiangtao Wu, Jiaming Wang, Yiwen He, Yuanxing Zhang, Shihao Li, Dunyuan Liu, Xuedong Zhao, Jialu Chen, Zekun Moore Wang, Jiaheng Liu

53 upvotesJune 7, 2026arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

A new benchmark called CoVEBench is introduced to evaluate compositional video editing capabilities, addressing limitations of existing models in handling complex, multi-step editing tasks while preserving spatiotemporal content.

text-guided video editingcompositional editingvideo editing benchmarkmulti-point editing instructionsinstruction compliancevideo fidelityautomated metricsspatiotemporal content preservation

Abstract

While recent text-guided video editing models excel at elementary tasks (e.g., style transfer, object insertion), real-world user requests are highly compositional. A single prompt often demands multiple coupled edits, such as modifying subjects, actions, and camera views, while strictly preserving unrelated spatiotemporal content. Existing benchmarks, heavily constrained by isolated edits and coarse global metrics, fail to diagnose how models handle such complex workflows. To address this gap, we introduce CoVEBench, a compositional video editing benchmark comprising 416 curated source videos, 626 multi-point editing instructions, and 9,990 fine-grained checklist items. Covering diverse editing dimensions, CoVEBench evaluates models via MLLM-judged instruction compliance and video fidelity, alongside automated metrics for video quality. Extensive experiments reveal that compositional editing remains a profound challenge: current models frequently omit edits, violate preservation constraints, or introduce artifacts when handling multiple operations simultaneously. CoVEBench provides a challenging, diagnostic testbed to advance video editing toward realistic user workflows.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号
CoVEBench: Can Video Editing Models Handle Complex Instructions? | TensorX