TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2605.14678

π-Bench: Evaluating Proactive Personal Assistant Agents in Long-Horizon Workflows

Haoran Zhang, Luxin Xu, Zhilin Wang, Runquan Gui, Shunkai Zhang, Haodi Lei, Zihao He, Bingsu He, Chicheng Qin, Tong Zhu, Xiaoye Qu, Yang Yang, Yu Cheng, Yafu Li

109 upvotesMay 19, 2026arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

Proactive assistance in personal agent systems requires identifying hidden user intents through sustained multi-turn interactions, which current benchmarks fail to adequately evaluate.

personal assistant agentslarge language modelsproactive assistanceuser intentsmulti-turn interactionsdomain-specific user personaslong-horizon trajectoriestask completionproactivity

Abstract

The rise of personal assistant agents, e.g., OpenClaw, highlights the growing potential of large language models to support users across everyday life and work. A core challenge in these settings is proactive assistance, since users often begin with underspecified requests and leave important needs, constraints, or preferences unstated. However, existing benchmarks rarely evaluate whether agents can identify and act on such hidden intents before they are explicitly stated, especially in sustained multi-turn interactions where user needs emerge gradually. To address this gap, we introduce π-Bench, a benchmark for proactive assistance comprising 100 multi-turn tasks across 5 domain-specific user personas. By incorporating hidden user intents, inter-task dependencies, and cross-session continuity, π-Bench evaluates agents' ability to anticipate and address user needs over extended interactions, jointly measuring proactivity and task completion in long-horizon trajectories that better reflect real-world use. Experiments show (1) proactive assistance remains challenging, (2) a clear distinction between task completion and proactivity, and (3) the value of prior interaction for proactive intent resolution in later tasks.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号