TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2603.24472

Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?

Jeonghye Kim, Xufang Luo, Minbeom Kim, Sangmook Lee, Dohyung Kim, Jiwon Jeon, Dongsheng Li, Yuqing Yang

59 upvotesMarch 25, 2026arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

Self-distillation in large language models can degrade mathematical reasoning performance by suppressing uncertainty expression, particularly affecting out-of-distribution tasks.

self-distillationlarge language modelsmathematical reasoningepistemic verbalizationreasoning tracesout-of-distribution performanceconditional contexttask coverage

Abstract

Self-distillation has emerged as an effective post-training paradigm for LLMs, often improving performance while shortening reasoning traces. However, in mathematical reasoning, we find that it can reduce response length while degrading performance. We trace this degradation to the suppression of epistemic verbalization - the model's expression of uncertainty during reasoning. Through controlled experiments varying conditioning context richness and task coverage, we show that conditioning the teacher on rich information suppresses uncertainty expression, enabling rapid in-domain optimization with limited task coverage but harming OOD performance, where unseen problems benefit from expressing uncertainty and adjusting accordingly. Across Qwen3-8B, DeepSeek-Distill-Qwen-7B, and Olmo3-7B-Instruct, we observe performance drops of up to 40%. Our findings highlight that exposing appropriate levels of uncertainty is crucial for robust reasoning and underscore the importance of optimizing reasoning behavior beyond merely reinforcing correct answer traces.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号