TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2512.14944

PuzzleCraft: Exploration-Aware Curriculum Learning for Puzzle-Based RLVR in VLMs

Ahmadreza Jeddi, Hakki Can Karaimer, Hue Nguyen, Zhongling Wang, Ke Zhao, Javad Rajabi, Ran Zhang, Raghav Goyal, Konstantinos G. Derpanis, Babak Taati, Radek Grzeszczuk

36 upvotesMarch 13, 2026arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

PuzzleCraft presents a supervision-free framework for scaling vision-centric RLVR using lightweight puzzle environments with built-in verification, incorporating an exploration-aware curriculum and a new consistency metric to improve reasoning robustness and downstream performance.

RL post-trainingvision-language modelschain-of-thought reasoningpuzzle-based RLVRcurriculum learningsolution-space dispersionReasoning-Answer Consistencyvisual pretext tasksPatchFitRotationJigsaw

Abstract

RL post-training with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a practical route to eliciting chain-of-thought reasoning in vision--language models (VLMs), but scaling it in the visual domain remains challenging due to costly or noisy supervision and reliance on external verifiers. Puzzle-based RLVR is a promising alternative, yet existing approaches often treat puzzle rewards as flat or sparse, which weakens group-relative learning signal. Existing curriculum strategies are overly restrictive: they rely mainly on reward statistics and do not account for exploration in the solution space, which can lead to collapsed rollout dynamics. Further, RL post-training can induce reasoning--answer inconsistency as training progresses. To address these shortcomings, we present PuzzleCraft, a supervision-free framework that scales vision-centric RLVR using a set of lightweight puzzle environments with built-in verification. PuzzleCraft instantiates three puzzles inspired by classic visual pretext tasks: PatchFit, Rotation, and Jigsaw. We introduce a curriculum that combines difficulty with an exploration signal derived from solution-space dispersion, and use it to downweight collapsed prompt groups. In addition, we introduce a new post-training metric, Reasoning-Answer Consistency (RAC), to measure the degree that the chain-of-though supports the answer, and show our exploration-aware curriculum improves RAC and downstream performance. Across a broad suite of vision-centric benchmarks, PuzzleCraft improves robustness and reasoning consistency, yielding consistent downstream gains on both Qwen2.5-VL and Qwen3-VL backbones. Overall, our results suggest that scalable puzzle-based RLVR benefits from curricula that account for both difficulty and solution-space collapse, together with explicit consistency-enhancing schemes.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号