TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2512.10863

MMSI-Video-Bench: A Holistic Benchmark for Video-Based Spatial Intelligence

Jingli Lin, Runsen Xu, Shaohao Zhu, Sihan Yang, Peizhou Cao, Yunlong Ran, Miao Hu, Chenming Zhu, Yiman Xie, Yilin Long, Wenbo Hu, Dahua Lin, Tai Wang, Jiangmiao Pang

22 upvotesDecember 11, 2025arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

MMSI-Video-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark for video-based spatial intelligence in MLLMs, revealing significant gaps between human and AI performance and highlighting challenges in geometric reasoning, motion grounding, and cross-video correspondence.

MMSI-Video-Benchspatial intelligenceMLLMsPerceptionPlanningPredictionCross-Video Reasoning3DV expertsfine-grained error analysisgeometric reasoningmotion groundinglong-horizon predictioncross-video correspondenceframe-sampling strategies3D spatial cueschain-of-thought prompting

Abstract

Spatial understanding over continuous visual input is crucial for MLLMs to evolve into general-purpose assistants in physical environments. Yet there is still no comprehensive benchmark that holistically assesses the progress toward this goal. In this work, we introduce MMSI-Video-Bench, a fully human-annotated benchmark for video-based spatial intelligence in MLLMs. It operationalizes a four-level framework, Perception, Planning, Prediction, and Cross-Video Reasoning, through 1,106 questions grounded in 1,278 clips from 25 datasets and in-house videos. Each item is carefully designed and reviewed by 3DV experts with explanatory rationales to ensure precise, unambiguous grounding. Leveraging its diverse data sources and holistic task coverage, MMSI-Video-Bench also supports three domain-oriented sub-benchmarks (Indoor Scene Perception Bench, Robot Bench and Grounding Bench) for targeted capability assessment. We evaluate 25 strong open-source and proprietary MLLMs, revealing a striking human--AI gap: many models perform near chance, and the best reasoning model lags humans by nearly 60%. We further find that spatially fine-tuned models still fail to generalize effectively on our benchmark. Fine-grained error analysis exposes systematic failures in geometric reasoning, motion grounding, long-horizon prediction, and cross-video correspondence. We also show that typical frame-sampling strategies transfer poorly to our reasoning-intensive benchmark, and that neither 3D spatial cues nor chain-of-thought prompting yields meaningful gains. We expect our benchmark to establish a solid testbed for advancing video-based spatial intelligence.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号