TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2511.15210

Unveiling Intrinsic Dimension of Texts: from Academic Abstract to Creative Story

Vladislav Pedashenko, Laida Kushnareva, Yana Khassan Nibal, Eduard Tulchinskii, Kristian Kuznetsov, Vladislav Zharchinskii, Yury Maximov, Irina Piontkovskaya

91 upvotesNovember 19, 2025arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

The study explores intrinsic dimension in large language models through cross-encoder analysis, linguistic features, and sparse autoencoders, revealing its independence from entropy, genre-specific stratification, and causal features related to text type.

intrinsic dimensioncross-encoder analysissparse autoencodersentropy-based metricsgenre stratificationscientific proseencyclopedic contentcreative/opinion writingcausal featuresformal tonereport templatesstatisticshumanized signalspersonalizationemotionnarrative

Abstract

Intrinsic dimension (ID) is an important tool in modern LLM analysis, informing studies of training dynamics, scaling behavior, and dataset structure, yet its textual determinants remain underexplored. We provide the first comprehensive study grounding ID in interpretable text properties through cross-encoder analysis, linguistic features, and sparse autoencoders (SAEs). In this work, we establish three key findings. First, ID is complementary to entropy-based metrics: after controlling for length, the two are uncorrelated, with ID capturing geometric complexity orthogonal to prediction quality. Second, ID exhibits robust genre stratification: scientific prose shows low ID (~8), encyclopedic content medium ID (~9), and creative/opinion writing high ID (~10.5) across all models tested. This reveals that contemporary LLMs find scientific text "representationally simple" while fiction requires additional degrees of freedom. Third, using SAEs, we identify causal features: scientific signals (formal tone, report templates, statistics) reduce ID; humanized signals (personalization, emotion, narrative) increase it. Steering experiments confirm these effects are causal. Thus, for contemporary models, scientific writing appears comparatively "easy", whereas fiction, opinion, and affect add representational degrees of freedom. Our multi-faceted analysis provides practical guidance for the proper use of ID and the sound interpretation of ID-based results.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号
Unveiling Intrinsic Dimension of Texts: from Academic Abstract to Creative Story | TensorX