Paper · arXiv 2511.14366
ATLAS: A High-Difficulty, Multidisciplinary Benchmark for Frontier Scientific Reasoning
Hongwei Liu, Junnan Liu, Shudong Liu, Haodong Duan, Yuqiang Li, Mao Su, Xiaohong Liu, Guangtao Zhai, Xinyu Fang, Qianhong Ma, Taolin Zhang, Zihan Ma, Yufeng Zhao, Peiheng Zhou, Linchen Xiao, Wenlong Zhang, Shijie Zhou, Xingjian Ma, Siqi Sun, Jiaye Ge, Meng Li, Yuhong Liu, Jianxin Dong, Jiaying Li, Hui Wu, Hanwen Liang, Jintai Lin, Yanting Wang, Jie Dong, Tong Zhu, Tianfan Fu, Conghui He, Qi Zhang, Songyang Zhang, Lei Bai, Kai Chen
ATLAS, a large-scale, cross-disciplinary evaluation suite, addresses the limitations of existing benchmarks by providing high-difficulty, original, and high-fidelity scientific problems to assess the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models.
Abstract
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to performance saturation on many established benchmarks, questioning their ability to distinguish frontier models. Concurrently, existing high-difficulty benchmarks often suffer from narrow disciplinary focus, oversimplified answer formats, and vulnerability to data contamination, creating a fidelity gap with real-world scientific inquiry. To address these challenges, we introduce ATLAS (AGI-Oriented Testbed for Logical Application in Science), a large-scale, high-difficulty, and cross-disciplinary evaluation suite composed of approximately 800 original problems. Developed by domain experts (PhD-level and above), ATLAS spans seven core scientific fields: mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, computer science, earth science, and materials science. Its key features include: (1) High Originality and Contamination Resistance, with all questions newly created or substantially adapted to prevent test data leakage; (2) Cross-Disciplinary Focus, designed to assess models' ability to integrate knowledge and reason across scientific domains; (3) High-Fidelity Answers, prioritizing complex, open-ended answers involving multi-step reasoning and LaTeX-formatted expressions over simple multiple-choice questions; and (4) Rigorous Quality Control, employing a multi-stage process of expert peer review and adversarial testing to ensure question difficulty, scientific value, and correctness. We also propose a robust evaluation paradigm using a panel of LLM judges for automated, nuanced assessment of complex answers. Preliminary results on leading models demonstrate ATLAS's effectiveness in differentiating their advanced scientific reasoning capabilities. We plan to develop ATLAS into a long-term, open, community-driven platform to provide a reliable "ruler" for progress toward Artificial General Intelligence.