TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2507.03483

BMMR: A Large-Scale Bilingual Multimodal Multi-Discipline Reasoning Dataset

Zhiheng Xi, Guanyu Li, Yutao Fan, Honglin Guo, Yufang Liu, Xiaoran Fan, Jiaqi Liu, Jingchao Ding, Wangmeng Zuo, Zhenfei Yin, Lei Bai, Tao Ji, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang

24 upvotesJuly 4, 2025arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

A large-scale bilingual, multimodal, multi-disciplinary reasoning dataset (BMMR) is introduced to evaluate and develop large multimodal models (LMMs) across various disciplines and formats, with a focus on reasoning paths and discipline-specific performance.

bilingualmultimodalmulti-disciplinary reasoninglarge multimodal modelsLMMsUNESCO-defined subjectsmultiple-choicefill-in-the-blankopen-ended QAhuman-in-the-loopscalable frameworkreasoning pathBMMR-EvalBMMR-Trainprocess-based multi-discipline verifierBMMR-Verifierreasoning-chain analyses

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce BMMR, a large-scale bilingual, multimodal, multi-disciplinary reasoning dataset for the community to develop and evaluate large multimodal models (LMMs). BMMR comprises 110k college-level questions spanning 300 UNESCO-defined subjects, spanning diverse formats-multiple-choice, fill-in-the-blank, and open-ended QA-and sourced from both print and digital media such as books, exams, and quizzes. All data are curated and filtered via a human-in-the-loop and scalable framework, and each instance is paired with a high-quality reasoning path. The dataset is organized into two parts: BMMR-Eval that comprises 20,458 high-quality instances to comprehensively assess LMMs' knowledge and reasoning across multiple disciplines in both Chinese and English; and BMMR-Train that contains 88,991 instances to support further research and development, extending the current focus on mathematical reasoning to diverse disciplines and domains. In addition, we propose the process-based multi-discipline verifier (i.e., BMMR-Verifier) for accurate and fine-grained evaluation of reasoning paths. Extensive experiments on 24 models reveal that (i) even SOTA models (e.g., o3 and Gemini-2.5-Pro) leave substantial headroom on BMMR-Eval; (ii) reasoning models exhibit discipline bias and outperform LMMs only on specific subjects; (iii) open-source models still trail their proprietary counterparts; and (iv) fine-tuning on BMMR-Train narrows this gap. Additionally, we conduct reasoning-chain analyses using BMMR-Verifier and other in-depth studies, uncovering the challenges LMMs currently face in multidisciplinary reasoning. We will release the data, and we hope our work can offer insights and contributions to the community.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号
BMMR: A Large-Scale Bilingual Multimodal Multi-Discipline Reasoning Dataset | TensorX