TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2504.19093

CipherBank: Exploring the Boundary of LLM Reasoning Capabilities through Cryptography Challenges

Yu Li, Qizhi Pei, Mengyuan Sun, Honglin Lin, Chenlin Ming, Xin Gao, Jiang Wu, Conghui He, Lijun Wu

18 upvotesApril 27, 2025arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

CipherBank evaluates the reasoning capabilities of large language models in cryptographic decryption tasks, revealing significant gaps in their performance across classical and custom encryption methods.

LLMsCipherBankreasoning capabilitiescryptographic decryption tasksplaintextsencryption methodsclassical cipherscustom cryptographic techniquesGPT-4oDeepSeek-V3reasoning-focused models

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, especially the recent advancements in reasoning, such as o1 and o3, pushing the boundaries of AI. Despite these impressive achievements in mathematics and coding, the reasoning abilities of LLMs in domains requiring cryptographic expertise remain underexplored. In this paper, we introduce CipherBank, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of LLMs in cryptographic decryption tasks. CipherBank comprises 2,358 meticulously crafted problems, covering 262 unique plaintexts across 5 domains and 14 subdomains, with a focus on privacy-sensitive and real-world scenarios that necessitate encryption. From a cryptographic perspective, CipherBank incorporates 3 major categories of encryption methods, spanning 9 distinct algorithms, ranging from classical ciphers to custom cryptographic techniques. We evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs on CipherBank, e.g., GPT-4o, DeepSeek-V3, and cutting-edge reasoning-focused models such as o1 and DeepSeek-R1. Our results reveal significant gaps in reasoning abilities not only between general-purpose chat LLMs and reasoning-focused LLMs but also in the performance of current reasoning-focused models when applied to classical cryptographic decryption tasks, highlighting the challenges these models face in understanding and manipulating encrypted data. Through detailed analysis and error investigations, we provide several key observations that shed light on the limitations and potential improvement areas for LLMs in cryptographic reasoning. These findings underscore the need for continuous advancements in LLM reasoning capabilities.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号
CipherBank: Exploring the Boundary of LLM Reasoning Capabilities through Cryptography Challenges | TensorX