TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2407.01284

We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?

Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong, Minhui Wu, Chong Sun, Xiaoshuai Song, Zhuoma GongQue, Shanglin Lei, Zhe Wei, Miaoxuan Zhang, Runfeng Qiao, Yifan Zhang, Xiao Zong, Yida Xu, Muxi Diao, Zhimin Bao, Chen Li, Honggang Zhang

81 upvotesJuly 1, 2024arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

WE-MATH benchmark evaluates Large Multimodal Models in visual mathematical reasoning, focusing on knowledge acquisition and generalization principles beyond end-to-end performance.

Large Multimodal Modelsvisual mathematical reasoningMathVistaMathVerseWE-MATHvisual math problemshierarchical knowledge conceptssub-problemsInconsistent KnowledgeInadequate GeneralizationComplete MasteryRote Memorizationknowledge augmentation strategiesGPT-4o

Abstract

Visual mathematical reasoning, as a fundamental visual reasoning ability, has received widespread attention from the Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) community. Existing benchmarks, such as MathVista and MathVerse, focus more on the result-oriented performance but neglect the underlying principles in knowledge acquisition and generalization. Inspired by human-like mathematical reasoning, we introduce WE-MATH, the first benchmark specifically designed to explore the problem-solving principles beyond end-to-end performance. We meticulously collect and categorize 6.5K visual math problems, spanning 67 hierarchical knowledge concepts and five layers of knowledge granularity. We decompose composite problems into sub-problems according to the required knowledge concepts and introduce a novel four-dimensional metric, namely Insufficient Knowledge (IK), Inadequate Generalization (IG), Complete Mastery (CM), and Rote Memorization (RM), to hierarchically assess inherent issues in LMMs' reasoning process. With WE-MATH, we conduct a thorough evaluation of existing LMMs in visual mathematical reasoning and reveal a negative correlation between solving steps and problem-specific performance. We confirm the IK issue of LMMs can be effectively improved via knowledge augmentation strategies. More notably, the primary challenge of GPT-4o has significantly transitioned from IK to IG, establishing it as the first LMM advancing towards the knowledge generalization stage. In contrast, other LMMs exhibit a marked inclination towards Rote Memorization - they correctly solve composite problems involving multiple knowledge concepts yet fail to answer sub-problems. We anticipate that WE-MATH will open new pathways for advancements in visual mathematical reasoning for LMMs. The WE-MATH data and evaluation code are available at https://github.com/We-Math/We-Math.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号
We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning? | TensorX