TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2312.12436

A Challenger to GPT-4V? Early Explorations of Gemini in Visual Expertise

Chaoyou Fu, Renrui Zhang, Haojia Lin, Zihan Wang, Timin Gao, Yongdong Luo, Yubo Huang, Zhengye Zhang, Longtian Qiu, Gaoxiang Ye, Yunhang Shen, Mengdan Zhang, Peixian Chen, Sirui Zhao, Xiawu Zheng, Shaohui Lin, Deqiang Jiang, Di Yin, Peng Gao, Ke Li, Xing Sun, Rongrong Ji

14 upvotesDecember 19, 2023arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

Preliminary evaluation of Gemini Pro's visual understanding shows it to be a strong contender to GPT-4V in multi-modal learning, though both models face challenges in achieving domain generalization compared to open-sourced systems.

Multi-modal Large Language ModelsMLLMsGPT-4VGeminivisual understandingfundamental perceptionadvanced cognitionchallenging vision tasksexpert capacitiesMME benchmarkdomain generalizationartificial general intelligence

Abstract

The surge of interest towards Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), e.g., GPT-4V(ision) from OpenAI, has marked a significant trend in both academia and industry. They endow Large Language Models (LLMs) with powerful capabilities in visual understanding, enabling them to tackle diverse multi-modal tasks. Very recently, Google released Gemini, its newest and most capable MLLM built from the ground up for multi-modality. In light of the superior reasoning capabilities, can Gemini challenge GPT-4V's leading position in multi-modal learning? In this paper, we present a preliminary exploration of Gemini Pro's visual understanding proficiency, which comprehensively covers four domains: fundamental perception, advanced cognition, challenging vision tasks, and various expert capacities. We compare Gemini Pro with the state-of-the-art GPT-4V to evaluate its upper limits, along with the latest open-sourced MLLM, Sphinx, which reveals the gap between manual efforts and black-box systems. The qualitative samples indicate that, while GPT-4V and Gemini showcase different answering styles and preferences, they can exhibit comparable visual reasoning capabilities, and Sphinx still trails behind them concerning domain generalizability. Specifically, GPT-4V tends to elaborate detailed explanations and intermediate steps, and Gemini prefers to output a direct and concise answer. The quantitative evaluation on the popular MME benchmark also demonstrates the potential of Gemini to be a strong challenger to GPT-4V. Our early investigation of Gemini also observes some common issues of MLLMs, indicating that there still remains a considerable distance towards artificial general intelligence. Our project for tracking the progress of MLLM is released at https://github.com/BradyFU/Awesome-Multimodal-Large-Language-Models.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号
A Challenger to GPT-4V? Early Explorations of Gemini in Visual Expertise | TensorX