TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2312.02696

Analyzing and Improving the Training Dynamics of Diffusion Models

Tero Karras, Miika Aittala, Jaakko Lehtinen, Janne Hellsten, Timo Aila, Samuli Laine

33 upvotesDecember 5, 2023arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

Modifications to network layers in the ADM diffusion model architecture improve training stability and synthesis quality, reducing FID from 2.41 to 1.81, and a novel method for post-hoc EMA parameter tuning is introduced.

diffusion modelsADM diffusion modelnetwork activationsweightsfast deterministic samplingexponential moving average (EMA)

Abstract

Diffusion models currently dominate the field of data-driven image synthesis with their unparalleled scaling to large datasets. In this paper, we identify and rectify several causes for uneven and ineffective training in the popular ADM diffusion model architecture, without altering its high-level structure. Observing uncontrolled magnitude changes and imbalances in both the network activations and weights over the course of training, we redesign the network layers to preserve activation, weight, and update magnitudes on expectation. We find that systematic application of this philosophy eliminates the observed drifts and imbalances, resulting in considerably better networks at equal computational complexity. Our modifications improve the previous record FID of 2.41 in ImageNet-512 synthesis to 1.81, achieved using fast deterministic sampling. As an independent contribution, we present a method for setting the exponential moving average (EMA) parameters post-hoc, i.e., after completing the training run. This allows precise tuning of EMA length without the cost of performing several training runs, and reveals its surprising interactions with network architecture, training time, and guidance.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号
Analyzing and Improving the Training Dynamics of Diffusion Models | TensorX