Paper · arXiv 2309.05689
Large Language Model for Science: A Study on P vs. NP
Qingxiu Dong, Li Dong, Ke Xu, Guangyan Zhou, Yaru Hao, Zhifang Sui, Furu Wei
LLMs, using Socratic reasoning, generate a proof schema and engage in rigorous dialogue to address the P vs. NP problem, aligning with existing research.
Abstract
In this work, we use large language models (LLMs) to augment and accelerate research on the P versus NP problem, one of the most important open problems in theoretical computer science and mathematics. Specifically, we propose Socratic reasoning, a general framework that promotes in-depth thinking with LLMs for complex problem-solving. Socratic reasoning encourages LLMs to recursively discover, solve, and integrate problems while facilitating self-evaluation and refinement. Our pilot study on the P vs. NP problem shows that GPT-4 successfully produces a proof schema and engages in rigorous reasoning throughout 97 dialogue turns, concluding "P neq NP", which is in alignment with (Xu and Zhou, 2023). The investigation uncovers novel insights within the extensive solution space of LLMs, shedding light on LLM for Science.