TensorX
返回文献探索

Paper · arXiv 2305.15038

Is GPT-4 a Good Data Analyst?

Liying Cheng, Xingxuan Li, Lidong Bing

6 upvotesMay 24, 2023arXiv 预印本
AI 摘要

GPT-4 demonstrates comparable performance to human data analysts in end-to-end data analysis tasks across various domains.

Abstract

As large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their powerful capabilities in plenty of domains and tasks, including context understanding, code generation, language generation, data storytelling, etc., many data analysts may raise concerns if their jobs will be replaced by AI. This controversial topic has drawn a lot of attention in public. However, we are still at a stage of divergent opinions without any definitive conclusion. Motivated by this, we raise the research question of "is GPT-4 a good data analyst?" in this work and aim to answer it by conducting head-to-head comparative studies. In detail, we regard GPT-4 as a data analyst to perform end-to-end data analysis with databases from a wide range of domains. We propose a framework to tackle the problems by carefully designing the prompts for GPT-4 to conduct experiments. We also design several task-specific evaluation metrics to systematically compare the performance between several professional human data analysts and GPT-4. Experimental results show that GPT-4 can achieve comparable performance to humans. We also provide in-depth discussions about our results to shed light on further studies before we reach the conclusion that GPT-4 can replace data analysts.

北京市昌平区探索星信息技术及软件开发工作室

京ICP备2026059466号
Is GPT-4 a Good Data Analyst? | TensorX